Deliverable (number) | Deliverable name | Work package number | Short name of lead participant | Type [1] | Dissemination level [2] | Delivery date (project month)
|
D1.1![]() |
Application Requirements | 1 | MM | R | PU [3] | 6 |
D1.2 | Parallel Applications | 1 | AB | DEM | CI | 18 |
D1.3 | Integrated Applications | 1 | AB | DEM | CI | 30 |
D1.4![]() |
Validation Reports | 1 | PIT | R | PU | 36 |
D2.1![]() |
Specification of Hardware Platform |
2 | MM | R | PU | 6 |
D2.2 ![]() |
Detailed Characterization of Platforms |
2 | ETH | R | PU | 18 |
D2.3 | Final Board | 2 | MM | DEM | PU | 36 |
D3.1 ![]() |
Programming Model(s) analysis and selection |
3 | ETH | R | PU | 6 |
D3.2 | Preliminary support for predictability in the accelerator programing environment |
3 | ETH | DEM | CO | 18 |
D3.3 ![]() |
Optimized support for predictability in the accelerator programing environment |
3 | ETH | DEM, R | PU | 24 |
D3.4 | Preliminary runtime for parallel heterogeneous platforms |
3 | ETH | DEM | CO | 18 |
D3.5 ![]() |
Optimized runtime for parallel heterogeneous platforms |
3 | ETH | DEM, R | PU | 24 |
D4.1 | Real-time Linux – preliminary | 4 | EVI | DEM, R | CO | 18 |
D4.2 ![]() |
Real-time Linux – final | 4 | EVI | DEM, R | PU | 24 |
D4.3 | Lightweight RTOS – preliminary |
4 | EVI | DEM, R | CO | 18 |
D4.4![]() |
Lightweight RTOS – final | 4 | EVI | DEM, R | PU | 24 |
D4.5![]() |
Multi-OS integration and Virtualization |
4 | EVI | DEM, R | PU | 30 |
D5.1![]() |
Power-Aware Scheduling Algorithm for Host |
5 | CTU | R | PU | 24 |
D5.2 ![]() |
Memory-Aware Scheduling Algorithm for Accelerators |
5 | CTU | R | PU | 24 |
D5.3![]() |
Integrated Schedulability Analysis |
5 | UNIMORE | R | PU | 30 |
D6.1 | Preliminary exploitation plan |
6 | PIT | R | CO | 12 |
D6.2![]() |
Final exploitation plan | 6 | PIT | R | PU | 36 |
D6.3 ![]() |
Open source strategy plan | 6 | PIT | R | PU | 12 |
D6.4![]() |
Open source results | 6 | EVI | R | PU | 36 |
D7.1 ![]() |
Project management plan | 7 | UNIMORE | R | PU | 3 |
D7.2 ![]() |
Year 1 Periodic report | 7 | UNIMORE | R | PU | 12 |
D7.3 | Year 2 Periodic report | 7 | UNIMORE | R | PU | 24 |
D7.4![]() |
Final Periodic report | 7 | UNIMORE | R | PU | 36 |
D7.5 ![]() |
Project Management and Collaboration Tools |
7 | UNIMORE | DEM, R | PU | 3 |
D7.6 | Dissemination plan | 7 | PIT | R | CO | 6 |
D7.7 | Preliminary dissemination report |
7 | PIT | R | CO | 18 |
D7.8 ![]() |
Final dissemination report | 7 | PIT | R | PU | 36 |
Notes:
[1] R –> Document, report (excluding the periodic and final reports); DEM –> Demonstrator, pilot, prototype, plan designs; DEC –>Websites, patents filing, press & media actions, videos, etc; OTHER –> Software, technical diagram, etc.
[2] PU –>Public, fully open, e.g. web ; CO –>Confidential, restricted under conditions set out in Model Grant Agreement; CI –> Classified.
[3] Depending on the classification level of the single application, some parts of the deliverable could be classified or omitted.